First and foremost I must say that the American trailer for 2046 has to be the most misleading trailer since the one for Coyote Ugly. 2046 is not Wong Kar Wai’s stab at future noir, a la Blade Runner, but the sequel to his previous film, In the Mood for Love. Now, the idea of a sequel to In the Mood for Love, as entrancing a piece of cinema as it is, strikes me as intriguing, but not essential. Sadly the same could be said for the story itself. As often as it hits a right note, it draws out 5 or 6 superfluous ones.
The story of the film, 2046, picks up shortly after the end of Mood. Chow Mo Wan’s (Tony Leung) character has left his job as a newspaperman and taken up writing pulp sci-fi novels. 2046 is the name of his latest effort regarding a city of the same name where people go to recall long forgotten memories. To get to 2046 requires transit on train that only leaves once in a blue moon. To everyday folk it would seem 2046 has massive drawing power, as no one who has left for it has ever returned. But that’s where Wan’s mysterious lead character is different. Not wanting to live in a place where everything stays the same, he boards a train back from 2046. But 2046 has a different meaning in Wan’s world, taken from the number of the hotel apartment adjacent to his own, and its parade of female tenants that never cease to remind him of his long lost love, and the secret he sealed with earth (see the previous film!). Over the months, as different women come, go, and return to the
apartment next door, he finds his daily fantasies, ghosts from the past, and the women themselves become entwined in his fictional narrative.
I’ll admit. It does sound intriguing. To me, the most interesting scenes involved Leung and Faye Wong, who plays Wang Jing Wen, a young Chinese woman in a forbidden relationship with a Japanese man. Both Leung and Wong of the rare breed of actor, with talent equal to their innate attractiveness and likeability. There’s true chemistry between these two, especially in the scenes where Wen aides Wan in putting his story on paper. It’s the same chemistry that made Chungking Express so enjoyable.
Gong Li also gives a strong performance. It is somewhat interesting to see both of Zhang Yimou’s muses, the new younger model, and the more mature, arguably more talented one, who grew tired of his direction, in the same film.
The visual style for Wan’s world is sumptuous. Smoky, dark, rich…the pallet is much like that of In the Mood for Love. If you’ve seen it, you know what to expect. The future is quite bright in contrast, with strong greens, reds, and clean white-whites the likes of, well, pulp sci-fi. The costumes for those scenes are imaginative and playful, evidenced quite well in that of Faye Wong’s second character, robot attendant wjw1967 (note her name above) on the train from 2046. But as with many of the CG special effect efforts of recent Chinese cinema, the computer visuals seem exceedingly lacking.
Aside from being overly long, my only other gripe would be Zhang Ziyi. Frankly, she is terrible. I really don’t understand the hype about this actress. Her martial arts are no substitute for weak acting ability and her soulless eyes never fail to creep me out. In this film, dolled up as she may be, she just misses
attaining the screen presence of a shoehorn. I had to pinch myself to stay awake. But as soon as she is gone it is once again smooth, albeit slow sailing.
On the whole 2046 is not a bad film, but rather a somewhat disappointing one. The story is serviceable, but it may be the one case where a chopped down American version may help the flow of the film, and audience retention. Go to see the visuals. While the story may not be recalled a few days down the line, the visuals and entrancing theme music, as with Wong Kar Wai’s other films aided by maximum repetition, will stay in your head long afterwards. As an added bonus, keep an eye out for Maggie Cheung in one of the 2046 scenes. ;)
2046 opens August 5th, 2005.

Filed Under: 2046, Faye Wong, Gong Li, Maggie Cheung, Tony Leung, Wong Kar Wai, Zhang Ziyi
Categories: ASIAN, China, MOVIES, Sci Fi
Subscribe: RSS
For some reason while I agreed with many of the points you raised about this film, the comment about Zhang infuriated me.
That is strange for me because I do indeed know that taste is entirely subjective–as with many things..but I just never thought that someone would say Ziyi’s performance was “terrible”. I mean from what you claim–”bland”, “unaffecting”, “dissapointing” would be better adjectives–but “terrible”?
So once again I’d have to consider the extremely subjective nature of these kinds of things..but I don’t see what else she could’ve done. I do indeed have a bias because I’m a huge Ziyi fan, but initially only for her cuteness–it wasn’t until “The Road Home” (actually her first movie–a drama with Zhang Yimou) and now “2046″ that I found her to be an amazing actress. Many claim that this is the best performance by far she’s ever given–and I entirely agree.
If your complaint is that she has soulless eyes–I’ve never been able to understand comments like that anyway–perhaps her looks–in particular her eyes just fail to affect you–but in that case how does an actress make their eyes have “soul”? It’s the same as comparisons in music between certain pop singers who try to sing soul and of course–soul singers–the argument of one having soul and the other sounding mechanical. In that case aesthetic concepts such as soul are so subjective in nature themselves and perceived differently by everyone–that I wonder how anyone can even decide *solidly* that something has or does not have something like soul.
And now I have ranted far too much–and for that I am truly sorry haha.
But yes. I love Zhang and thought she was amazing.
But Faye Wong was the best in this movie..IMO…she captivated me in every scene she was in.
I checked out your review and agree with the tone of it, if not with all the specifics. ;)
I saw it at the Seattle International Film Festival in May, and both screenings were sold out, with extremely excited audiences waiting for the lights to dim. I’ll say that the mood of the audience after the show was pretty quiet, and a little restless and a bit relieved that the film was over (it IS long, and more importantly FEELS long).
Personally I think Zhang Ziyi’s plot was the best part of the film. I think she is proving her worth as an excellent dramatic actress that is so much more than just an action super-star. Her character broke my heart. This 45 minute or so chunk of the film was most involving for me.
Gong Li seemed just sort of thrown in almost as a cameo, like, “Look! Gong Li! OK, she’s gone!” and I felt she was wasted. Why bother putting her in a film if you are not going to use her?
Yes, I agree that Tony Leung and Faye Wong have wonderful chemistry, and their plot was rather sweet, but it seemed so completely unrelated from the Zhang Ziyi story, that I wish that WKW would just chop up the film into more satisfying short stories, rather than stringing them together unsuccessfully. Yes, I know it is his style (like Chungking Express and Fallen Angels), but you have to admit it sometimes works better than others. In the Mood for Love was his strongest film, I think, because is was his most focused.
Oh, and I thought the sci-fi re-enactments were distracting and unneccessary.
So! There’s my review! :)
Cheers,
Linda
this film almost did it for me, but not quite. christopher doyle’s work was beautiful as usual, and the plot - while echoing days of being wild & in the mood for love - became a tad too convoluted to evoke any deeper understanding of the themes that wkw taps into over and over again (love, loss, memory & a very buddhist understanding of emptiness/fullness).
i have to agree with your critique of Zhang Ziyi. she sort of ruined the film for me - not because of her character - but i found her performance to be very hollow, forced, lacking in any maturity, and frankly somewhat annoying. i think people are taken by her good looks, but honestly (as someone who speaks mandarin) she does not strike me as a great actress. i don’t think she was appropriate for this film.
that being said, faye wong and tony leung were absolutely marvelous.
i’d like to watch 2046 a second time to see how my opinions change, but honestly all this talk just makes me want to watch in the mood for love instead.
A good review. To each his own, I beg to differ on Ziyi Zhang though. I thought she was amazing.
***SPOILER****
Especially once the tables turned and she was the one who wanted him to stay. Tony Leung “the man” to be able to get her to beg him. Oh yeah!
I’ve just seen 2046 and yes it can feel a bit long, yes the dialogue can be somewhat banal. I was noticing this in the first 20 minutes. But the film morphs, the pieces come together and the mood grabs hold of you and suddenly details seem unimportant; Like a Rembrandt painting where you don’t judge a blot of color but the collage. I thought the acting was great, I LOVED Zhang Ziyi and Leung. The soundtrack is haunting, mesmerizing at times.
I think great art conveys nuanced emotions that cannot be conveyed in a non artistic medium. Yes, if I will analyze this movie I can find a lot of flaws but the sadness it conveys is so elusive yet so powerful. I can compare it to Maborosi or even Ozu’s works. I wouldn’t argue that In the mood for love is more economic, but I think 2046 is a worthy follow up, and a masterpiece in its own right.
This was the emporer’s new film if I ever saw one. Except it felt like two or three. It was like watching celluloid dry. Pretentious, overly long, confusing, and inane. No story becomes “mysterious”, bad dialog becomes “poetry.” Poor acting becomes mood. Since when is cinematography enough to make a film good?
I live this to. You make for good to me. I live the sight.
maaannn did you say you fell asleep? lol, i dont even think its worth spoending much time answering this review, just an advise, watch the movie a few times until you get the point of it. i just done understand how can people write reviews about films that go far beyond their capabilities.
Hey Gopal! Actually I said I had to pinch myself to stay awake during Ziyi’s performance. I was remarking how her acting was far from compelling. I wasn’t saying that I fell asleep.
It’s an okay film, but definitely not one of his best.
Welcome to the site!
[...] auctions off her virginity, is comical rather than beautiful. I have remarked before about Ziyi’s acting ability, but this time even Kris mentioned she had the range of a “rubber doll.â [...]
oo…i love 2046!!! not neccessary the movie, but more because of the hot actors!! hehe..
Neither rhyme nor reason