ENDLESS DISPLAYS OF STUPIDITY Every country suffers from sequelitis at some point in time. As with those spurned by occidental production companies, Asian cinema has had its fair run of sequels in the past two decades. Some have topped the originals, some managed to entertain while being vastly inferior, and some have crashed and burned so extraordinarily bad you honestly wonder what the producers were smoking when they greenlit the film. But when it comes to sequels, I’d have to say Battle Royale II is to Japanese cinema what Mortal Kombat: Annihilation is to the Hollywood machine.
Though branded a Kinji Fukasaku film, this is definitely Kenta Fukasaku’s mess. (Kinji unfortunately passed away near the beginning of the shoot). While Kenta adapted the original Battle Royale for the screen, with this film the son of Kinji is both writer and substitute director. Clearly lacking the expertise that made his father so great, Kenta has crafted a film that is as hackneyed as it is uninteresting.
Battle Royale II takes place three years after the end of the first Battle Royale. It seems that after going on the lam with Noriko, the nonviolent Shuya has gone through a role reversal that would surprise all but the most ardent WWE fan. Declaring war on the world of adults, Shuya now heads up Wild Seven, a guerilla terrorism organization that blows up skyscrapers in the name of stickin’ it to The Man.
The adults have responded by reworking the entire rules of Battle Royale. Dubbed BRII, the system now focuses on using junior high kids for eliminating terrorist threats rather than weeding out the slacker element for the betterment of a modern Japanese society. The selected class is fitted in camouflage, given guns, and forced to work together as a covert ops unit to track down and kill Shuya. Danger zones and the exploding necklaces make a return, with the main catch being each kid is linked with a corresponding classmate of the opposite gender. (If one kid dies, his partner’s necklace also goes off.)
One of the things that made the first Battle Royale work so well was Kinji Fukasaku’s expert pacing. Though the characters were essential stereotypical cutouts of the different cliques found in any highschool, we managed to spend just enough time with each to honestly care about them. In Kenta’s sequel, we lose thirty kids within the first hour. While understandably an hour is not 
The violations of returning character integrity and the romanticizing of terrorist bombers as freedom fighters is equally disappointing. I can definitely understand Japan’s animosity toward the US (we did firebomb an alarming portion of their civilian population prior to dropping two nuclear bombs on their country, even though the Japanese were already doing their best to negotiate a ceasefire), but given the quality of the original film I expected a far more intelligent analysis than “Iraq good. US Bad.” We’re presented with the alarming realization that over the past 60 years, the United States has killed over 8 million people with its bombing campaigns, only to have it cast aside as if it was only voiced by the character due to some strange radio frequency picked up by a metal plate in their skull. Later, the prime minister calls up Sensei Takeuchi, warning of an impending air strike by the US, stating, “It was only a matter of time before we pissed off ‘that country.’ Every time they get mad they bomb somebody.” Again, Kenta presents the audience with a provocative and certainly understandable argument that could potentially serve as the basis for quite a few scenes, only to have it drop immediately within the next few lines of dialogue. Given the pedigree of the first film, this is dishearteningly pathetic.
But that’s not to say everything is bad. Riki Takeuchi (playing the teacher, “Riki Takeuchi”) does his usual excellent job of hamming it up. Beat Takeshi (aka: Takeshi Kitano) has a very small cameo in a flashback sequence of his character’s daughter. Likewise, Sonny Chiba has an interesting thirty-second cameo as Shuya’s terrorist mentor. But three serviceable performances by some of my favourite Japanese actors are not enough to gain this film a recommendation. If you’ve seen the original, just pretend this sequel doesn’t exist. If Kinji Fukasaku were alive today, he would be ashamed to have his name on this project.

See More: Battle Royale, Kenta Fukasaku, Kinji Fukasaku, Sonny Chiba, Tatsuya Fujiwara
Categories: ASIAN, Action, Japan, MOVIES, Splatter
Subscribe: RSS
Ok review, just keep your ignorant political views out of it.
“Kenta presents the audience with a provocative and certainly understandable argument…”
Just what are you saying here? I guess bombing is somehow worse than what the Japanese did to kill similar (greater?) numbers of people during, for example, WWII. Unless you think that in some sick way using human captives for bayonette practice (as the Japanese did to the Chinese) is somehow more acceptable? Not to mention raping women, their daughters (teenage and below) before sticking a blade through them.
I guess I can see why you review splatter films, kiddo.
Thanks for the feedback Bill. I apologize for my ignorance, but I don’t have cable, and therefore have no way to watch Fox news.
You may want to research the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Both bombs were dropped after the Japanese had been trying to negotiate a surrender.
From the wikipedia entry:
“Their use has been called barbaric as several hundreds of thousands of civilians were killed, and the target areas were known to be heavily populated by civilians. In the days just before their use, many scientists (including American nuclear physicist Edward Teller) argued that the destructive power of the bomb could have been demonstrated without the taking of lives.”
Then there are also the firebombings of Japanese villages where an estimated 100,000 Japanese were killed, again, mainly civilians. The totals for these three examples are greater than the 100 - 300,000 estimated for the Nanjing Massacre. Granted this is much less than the total number of Chinese deaths at the hands of the Japanese, but we cannot say our hands are entirely clean when it comes to civilian casualties.
And America is not without guilt when it comes to atrocities. You may want to look into those committed by American soldiers in Vietnam, or Korea. Or the reports of US Soldiers raping Iraqi women in the current gulf conflict. Again they are not on the scale of the Japanese and German atrocities, but we cannot claim that we have a clean record in that regard either.
For evidence of American imperialism you may want to look into any number of the campaigns executed in the name of spreading democracy. Cuba, Mexico, etc. And America is not above bombing another country to take the heat off of presidential philandering.
Just because what our country has done is not as bad as what another country has done doesn’t make it right.
And you may want to take a look around the site. We review more than just splatter films. ;)
Again, pardon the ignorance and thanks for the feedback.
Okay, regarding Hiroshima and Nagasaki…
The Japanese rejected the Potsdam Declaration on July 26. The Japanese stated that it was a copy of the Cairo declaration and that it did not wish to honor the resolution. The US wanted Japan to unconditionally surrender. The Japanese had refused.
The US clearly wanted Japan to accept Potsdam - no ifs, ands, or buts.
After bombing Hiroshima on August 6, the Japanese still refused to honor Potsdam, so the US bombed Nagasaki on August 9. The Japanese then surrendered and agreed to use Potsdam on August 15.
The reason why the US decided to nuke Japan was because, after seeing civilian suicides on Okinawa and other lands, the US believed that nuking Japan would result in less deaths than invading Japan. Also the US did not want Joey Stalin’s Soviet Union to take Japan and increase its influence in Asia, so the war had to end quickly too.
I visited Hiroshima, the A-Bomb dome, and the peace museum. If you have not been to Hiroshima, I would recommend visiting. The people have no animosity to Americans.
Chris you are an idiot.
First off, the Japanese did way more horrible things during World War 2 than the United States dropping off two atomic bombs. Yeah yeah, sure the U.S. was wrong, but AT LEAST THEY APOLOGIZED. The Japanese government hasn’t even apologized to the Chinese for the massive massacres and graveyards that have recently been found. The Japanese government wasn’t even found guilty by the US even though they have killed HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF CHINESE CIVILIANS AND SOLDIERS. All because the US was scared of the Communists in the Asia Pacific.
To say the Japanese is a victim during the wars is an exaggeration to an unreasonable degree. You sir, need to take a good History lesson before you start typing blogs like this before you choke on your own words.
Hey Simon, I love you too.
I think this might be another case of drive-by hating, but just in case, I’ll give you a response. Please check my earlier post. What I am saying is that the United States has a longer history of worldwide deathmaking than Japan ever did. I’m not legitimizing the acts of the Japanese military (there are completely unconscionable), but asking that you not go blindly forth thinking our American actions have been entirely warranted.
If you’re really interested, you might want to check this article on US atrocities:
http://www.commondreams.org/views/122300-101.htm
And, if you really want to get technical about it, communist Chinese leaders have killed far more Chinese citizens than the Japanese Military ever did. The estimates for Mao alone range as high as 75 million. And the majority of this toll was amassed after WWII. We don’t criticize that, however. Maybe because of current US economical policy?
You too might want to look into a few history classes.
Actually, many Japanese films deal with the tragedy of WWII, but moreso the importance of global peace.
There are a lot of things they do not tell you in History books, mainly because they are written and published by the anglo male perspective. America itself was founded on bloodshed, practically stealing land from Native Americans and Mexico.
In WWII, the treaties sought to insult the Japanese and their honorific stance and bullish pride. It was meant to anger them. It asked a country whose citizens would commit suicide to defend, for unconditional surrender. Worse yet, it sought to force the Emperor to resign, Dig a little deeper (i.e: government documents) and you’ll see the stark strategy people refuse to reveal/accept.
This was a chance for America to frighten the rest of the world. America dropped the atomic bomb AFTER they realized their worst fear was moot: that the Axis did not have nuclear weapons. America dropped the atomic bomb AFTER Germany surrendered, and was the plan all along. Multiple incendiary bombs were released prior, a smart move considering vast Japanese wooden construction. And here at home, Japanese were stripped of their property, possessions, dignity, forced into Internment camps/horse stables, even forced to leave America. So you can see a simple apology would be meaningless.
While we do always welcome intelligent debate ;) we recognize that our reviews may ruffle feathers because we seek the truth, and are not subject to popular opinion. Let me repeat opinion. Hey, everyone’s entitled to them. If ours do not appeal to your own, retorting in a immature manner will only dilute your statement.
In the future I hope people will be open-minded and try to see both sides of the story before resorting to biased name-calling. Does that even really change the past?
America, like any other country, has its flaws. True patriotism, like unconditional love, is allowing yourself the ability to see these flaws, not see through them.