Comments on: Kill Bill vol. 1 — he said, she said — movie review — screener! — +japanese-cut dvd!

By: dan

dan — Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:11:02 +0000

it seems like the so called “intelectual film school students” are very pissed off about the latest tarantino flick, well let me tell you something that might be a little helpfull when your find yourselves working as a blockbuster clerk ten years from now. the whole point of making movies happens to be entertain, task which, in this case, gets completely fullfilled, no matter your smart ass opinon. you all motherfuckers disgust me. Kill bill rules!!!!

By: Jermo

Jermo — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 00:52:22 +0000

Have to agree with the reviewers…a waste of time. Should have been one movie, and the focus should have been more concentrated. Next time Tarantino makes a movie, I’ll be sure to have earplugs – the guy’s dialogue makes me want to vomit.

By: james brown

james brown — Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:11:23 +0000

I love this movie. Uma makes me wanna bus a nut. Right on her big nose. She’s so ugly! Did you see that guy get chopped with the sword in the house with all the Chinese people? That was so cool! And then that girl with the swinging ball! This movie was AWESOME! You don’t know film if you don’t like this film! I LOVE KILL BILL! QUENTIN IS THE MAN!

By: Odnanref

Odnanref — Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:20:39 +0000

Tarantino has found transcendence. All you hipsters need now is to catch up.

By: Mike

Mike — Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:38:14 +0000

Kill Bill was the worst movie in existence. Tarantino doesn’t even understand the first thing about filmmaking.

By: Lucy007

Lucy007 — Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:33:26 +0000

That big twist ending I was hoping for which could have been so darn brilliant. The possibilities were endless. And everything centered around the daughter.

Well, without giving anything away let me tell you the ending is pretty straightforward. It’s still good but there’s no way vol 2. is even half as good as the first one.

By: Chris

Chris — Fri, 22 Jul 2005 18:08:09 +0000

This is old news, but he did originally say it was going to be one long film. Then, after the success of the Lord of the Rings and Matrix entries they said they would be released in two volumes. Whether pressure from the greedy greedy weinsteins or quentin’s own idea, I have no idea. What I do know is that they had planned abou 6 DVD release versions of the film, all with different sets of extras. A loose lipped Miramax rep let this slip to the press, complete with excited jabbering about how much money they projected they’d make, and all versions were promptly cancelled. I believe the guy was canned as well.

So, in my opinion, it boild down to $$$$.

By: jason

jason — Fri, 22 Jul 2005 06:28:54 +0000

He said that it was going to be two separate volumes from the beginning, but I don’t believe that for one second. It’s all about the money and the greed allright.

By: Kris Kobayashi-Nelson

Kris Kobayashi-Nelson — Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:39:40 +0000

uhmm.. G-R-E-E-D? Story-wise I don't see an advantage either.. Chris is a compendium of directors' reasoning and production companies et al so he can better answer this one.. :)

By: Doug

Doug — Wed, 20 Jul 2005 02:30:32 +0000

Can anyone seriously answer why this was separated in two? I mean, I know the story of Miramax…etc etc…I just would like to know what the advantage is story-wise because I was bored to death in the theater!

Thanks.