Come see costars get clobbered while the main characters defy gravity and all physics in Peter Jackson’s rendition epic of King Kong! Why, they survive a stampede and avalanche of not one, not two, but a bunch of brontosaurii, not to mention a swarm of freakishly giant lampreys and insects! Naomi Watts as breathless doe-caught-in-headlights Ann Darrow even lets giant centipede antennae probe her tonsils in some gross post-production humor, not hentai. Witness Colin Hanks turn into a young Dan Aykroyd! Watch Adrian Brody as the bravely stupid (or is that stupidly brave?) Jack Driscoll, the playwright turned screenwriter who wins Ann’s human heart (before she meets the gargantuan gorilla) and repeatedly rescues her.
And why not? Humans are so keen on themselves that only they would make a movie depicting themselves in the highest regard. Carl Denham (Jack Black), a man unnerved by the slaughter of seventeen men while filming, even announces something like: “don’t worry I’m someone you can trust… I’m a movie producer”. And yet this film is entirely built around man’s follies, the Man as Beast. It is Man who destroys nature by pollution and poaching; procures extinction of other creatures. It is Man who cannot bear to let his pride be rattled by nor share existence with other animals, including other humans. Modern Man, the sole species the mighty King Kong was afraid of… and he had knocked out a cloud of killer bats and a tag-team of carnivorous dinosaurs! Island “savages” chose to worship Kong, whereas so-called “civilized” man allowed avarice to steer them, allow consumerism to consume them. Don’t look so smug.. you’re no different if you’re ready to plunk down $10 to see this movie.
Well, please do because someone has to repay these special effects artists for doing a magnificent job, from the ferocious fight scenes right down to the fuzzy down of King Kong’s fur sitting poetically in
the sunset. (And it could just be a yen for foreshadowing, but I swear the background bridge support trusses formed repetitive K’s). Peter Jackson invited Andy Serkis (previously LotR’s Gollum) to emote and mime out the jumbo primate, which is perfection. There’s a playful, juvenile yet maternal Koko-esque quality to the Kong; you’ll love it when he hams it up with ex-Vaudeville Ann and when he discovers ice skating for the first time. But don’t forget to bring tissues because Jackson wants to give tear-manipulator (and new official employee of Paramount) Spielberg a run for his money. Although with Spielberg you’ll be spared the cheesy one-liners after particularly miserable moments.
While I josh, it is only because Peter Jackson brings out the frivolity and joviality of motion picture relationships. Even though he has produced arguably some of the most serious dramas of the new Millennium, audiences will walk away remembering his comic caricatures and comaraderie. He has a magic sense portrayal of friendship that far exceeds love and romance. This is why his style worked for the Hobbits and why it works for King Kong.
King Kong opens in theatres December 14th.
About the Author

![dreamlogic.net » MOVIE REVIEW [SCREENER] . King Kong (2005)](http://www.dreamlogic.net/NEWS/images/MUSINGS.gif)
a65ecc7c a65ecc7c
a65ecc7c posted on December 13th, 2005
I love gorillas!!..King Kong..is it a gorilla? or is it a science fiction version of a Giant Gorilla? I like my gorillas to act very authentically(lol I’m just wierd that way). I’m tempted to watch this in an IMAX theater now! Naomi Watts is so gorgeous!
Su posted on December 13th, 2005
Su! You make me laugh!
Umm, I guess the gorilla is authentic.. they are incredibly sharp and powerful creatures! There’s a lot of exaggerated facial expressions of course, but that makes him so loveable/humanistic since people search for that recognition/familiarity factor. I mentioned he reminded me of Koko when he cradles Ann/Naomi Watts in his arms. I’m not sure how much realism you’re expecting when he’s battling dinosaurs, but okay.
Kris Kobayashi-Nelson posted on December 14th, 2005
So I finally got to see this last night (Kris attended the screening while I was in finals). I’d have to say her review is spot on. I thought the effects were amazing, but this film suffered an action overload much like the Godzilla effort in the late 90’s. There’s only so much action you can take before you go numb to all the antics on screen. Watts, who admittedly isn’t a great acress in the first place, was reduced to staring mouth agape, while most of her “lines” consisted of overdubbed moaning for her scenes in Kong’s palm. This film also has THE worst closing line ever. If it was only to further punctuate what a self serving and blame placing bastard his character was, I guess it was suitable, but I’m afraid most audiences would just take it at face value.
Great effects, a surplus of action, bad acting, a little too long. Overall, pretty much what one would expect.
Chris Nelson posted on December 16th, 2005
And what was with the “boobies” line?
Chris Nelson posted on December 16th, 2005
I liked the boobies line. It made me think about Naomi Watts. I thought the film was splendifferous. If anything I would have made it a bit longer and shown Kong fighting more TRexes. It would have been cool to have Kong fight the brontosauruses as well. Great film! And to the reviewer, nice review!
Order 66 posted on December 19th, 2005
Kong was good and then bad and then good again and then more bad again. It would have been better if they took out the bad parts. I liked it but it wasn’t great.
HotNezz posted on December 29th, 2005
Informed and insightful review without all that fanboy gushing. Very nice to read. I thought this movie was good, but not great. It was sad when kong died, but I forgot the story a week later.
Vorinstalliert posted on February 3rd, 2006
watts is a great actress & you would know it if you ever saw mulholland dr & 21g. 2yrs ago at least 30 critics said she was the best actress of her generation, & this year the london critics who gave her best actress for king kong. she did about as well as anyone could have opposite a blue screen. & she will win best actress this year for the painted veil.
she often has her mouth open because that is not only her natural expression, but polls show it her sexiest. she played it exactly as the boss told her in this, & as she played it for lynch in md & inarritu when she got a best actress nom 2yrs ago. she was recently selected chair of the independent film organization, the ifp, which hosts the spirit awards the night before the oscars.
john posted on March 1st, 2006
John, what is she your mom? Watts is a ho. She’s only popular cause of her lesbo bit in MD. She hasn’t got an ounce of talent. OOOH AAAH! OOOH AAAH! wow, great range there bud.
Noni posted on March 30th, 2006
This movie rubbed me the wrong way. Nice to see a review without all the fanboy gushing. If LOTR and this are all Peter Jackson has in him after all these years, I hope he retires.
fopnal posted on July 30th, 2006