At just 80 minutes Death Proof is Quentin’s shortest film to date, and somehow his most interminable. Overly chatty and under-compelling, its tale of a stuntman/serial killer (a vehicular-homicidal maniac) lulls when it should wow and stalls when it should kick into high gear. The film is broken into two halves, the first concerning a band of shallow 20-something females on a bar-hopping night in Austin, Texas, and the second a group of Hollywood types killing time in-between set-calls while on location in Tennessee. Both involve over thirty minutes of gab, followed by approximately 10 minutes of action, once Russell’s Stuntman Mike comes out to play.
Now, these chat sessions wouldn’t be so bad if they actually established unique and interesting characters, or were even mildly entertaining (see: Two Lane Blacktop). Instead you have tired “frank sex” dialogs lifted from early 90’s indie films, and lengthy diatribes (verging on dry academic dissertations) about cult flicks. Each character, save for Mary Elizabeth Winstead’s cheer-skirted actress, speaks with the same voice: Quentin’s. You never believe they’ve actually seen the film’s they’re referencing, nor do you believe they would even want to see them even if given a trendy mall shopping spree in exchange. The African actor’s share a slightly different mouthpiece, that of Quentin’s stereotypical “black man.” Every line is “nigga” this and “bitch” that. In the film’s final sequence the second group’s black member screams “I’m gonna’ bus’ a nut up yo’ ass,” repeatedly. I went to high school in Denver, Colorado, with a roughly 50/50 black/white mix. None of the kids I knew spoke like Eddie Griffin.
If that wasn’t enough, the whole production seems as if it was shot over a weekend, with Quentin and his buddies (Eli Roth included) arriving in Austin on
Saturday, hitting up the Alamo Drafthouse, scooping some Mondo Tees, and on Sunday deciding to finally make a film. The acting, save for Russel, is all of the phoned in variety. Following her Planet Terror femme fatale Rose McGowan is reduced to a ditzy blonde. Sydney Poitier plays a showboating bitch. Rosario Dawson plays Rosario Dawson. Zoe Bell seems slightly insane. Lastly, Vanessa Ferlito’s gaping maw and tumor of a nose rob her character of the sex-appeal her narrative arc so desperately requires. Granted, the characters are all stereotypes, so there’s no real room to grow anyway (Those of you who are calling these women “strong feminist characters” need to get a life outside the comic shop), but it is nonetheless disappointing. Russel, I love his work, but he is sorely underused here. It’s great to see him on screen again, but I feel terribly sorry for the guy – especially following his character’s inexplicable breakdown toward the end of the film.
Action. You’re probably wondering about the action. Quentin spends a lot of time through his characters mouthing off about landmark chase scenes, lauding genre classics such as Vanishing Point and poo-pooing recent remakes such as Gone in 60 Seconds. Given the chest pounding pontifications you would expect some amazing stuff. Quentin made sure to have all sequences shot with real cars going real fast (no speeding up of the film) but even with Zoe Bell hanging of the hood while Stuntman Mike’s black muscle car rams hers from the side, the excitement just isn’t there. Maybe it’s because all the action seems to take place on straightaways, or maybe because the chases themselves seem overwrought and lacking in twists
(no one ever even bothers to slam on the breaks to lose a pursuer), but something just isn’t right. I hate to say it, but the new Gone in 60 Seconds DID have more thrills than Death Proof. Heck, Kurt Russell even starred in Breakdown, a film featuring an infinitely better end chase. That said, the mid-film car crash is amazing – near epic in its mangling and melding of flesh and metal.
Death Proof does mark the first time Tarantino’s handled the cinematography for his own film, and the shots are technically sound. There are impressive motion, crane, and tracking shots, as well as solid steady cam work. Furthermore, the film is exceedingly colorful. Quentin even pokes fun at his directorial trademarks, opening the film with bare feet and performing the camera-inside-the-hood, this time from beneath the “bonnet” of a white Vanishing Point 1970 Dodge Challenger. It’s nice work, but not enough to merit any sort of recommendation. Like Rodriguez, Tarantino makes sure to replicate the “real” Grindhouse experience, complete with a missing reel and choppy audio sync during accounted reel changes. However in this case the “missing reel” seems like a me-too affair (especially in light of the fact the lap-dance scene was fully scripted and in the trailer), and the audio sync jokes lose their funny after the second or third go-round.
In making Grindhouse Tarantino and Rodriguez stated they wanted to finally make exploitation films that were as good, if not better, than their posters. Sadly, Death Proof falls short of that goal. It’s pretty, but that’s really it. If you’re still feeling curious, watch through to the middle. Again, that car crash is amazing. If you’re just plain masochistic, feel free to stay to the end.
About the Author

Related Articles:

I was literally poking myself in the eye and scratching the skin off my arms to stay alert for this “feature”. It was the most painfully uneventful tripe I ever watched. I kept wondering “who talks like that?” and then later “who drives like that? I couldn’t believe that a car chase could be that boring!
I kept hoping for a twist where Kurt Russell turns it around but he just progressively and disturbingly whimpered. Poor Kurt.
Kris Kobayashi-Nelson posted on April 22nd, 2007
C’mon, Chris. Tell me how you REALLY feel.
Very nicely written diss. I guess art, like everything else, is relative. My review of the whole GRINDHOUSE enchilada is on its way.
And DEATH PROOF has just been restored to 110 minutes for the Cannes festival. I guess I know what to give you for Christmas.
Fernando posted on April 23rd, 2007
When replicating a grade-b flick, one must strive to make a grade-b flick. I think Quentin delivered exactly what he set out to deliver. If you went in expecting to see an epic when grindhouse flicks were being celebrated you, sir, are just an idiot.
Joe Sarletti posted on April 23rd, 2007
Thanks for the feedback, guys.
Joe, why is it that Tatantino fans always reduce a discussion to simple name calling? We at Dreamlogic enjoy a wide range of films, including many B-grade flicks. You should check out our list of Grindhouse Films Worth Watching and see for yourself. By your logic Tarantino set out to make a turd, so therefore we cannot criticise it for being a turd. But, given the statements referenced in my last paragraph that’s clearly not the case. It was meant to draw from b-grade sensibilities, but it was also meant to transcend them. Death Proof just wasn’t a good film, even when evaluated as a “Grindhouse” film.
Chris Nelson posted on April 23rd, 2007
the only thing I resented was the “comic shop” jab…but then again I’m only there once a week…
other than that, very entertaining critique, and now I want to see the movie less.
Greg posted on April 23rd, 2007
I saw this. I want my money back.
Loki posted on May 15th, 2007
Yeah, well… I can’t comment on the film coz us Brits are STILL getting screwed by the whole US Grindhouse debacle.
I will ask this though… With reference paid to Jonathan Mostow’s near perfect BREAKDOWN and it’s climactic car chase, don’t you think - and this is rich coming from a car chase whore like myself - that the car chase and subsequent fisticuffs feels like an outright betrayal of all that has gone before it?
As I wrote in my mini-review of Breakdown as part of my weekly OFF THE SHELF column over at filmrot.com, which can be found here by the way:
http://www.filmrot.com/articles/reviews/007932.php
(Pimpin’ it BIG STYYYLE!
)
“… I friggin’ love this movie to death BUT… that stupid-friggin’ (probably studio-imposed) ending is completely at odds with what is one of the most under-rated taut, edge-of-the-seat entries into the thriller genre in a long, long time. It’s all exceptionally well-played by Kurt Russell, Kathleen Quinlan and the late, great JT Walsh and it’s brilliantly written and directed by Jonathan Mostow but that climax is a huge misfire on an otherwise brilliant film – it’s all car chases, car crashes, motorway pile-ups, overturned trucks hanging from high-level bridges and fisticuffs to the death which would normally be great fucking action entertainment but just not in this film; it’s a bit like watching It’s a Wonderful Life but having James Stewart run through the town at the end machine-gunning every one to death and throwing hand-grenades into the local stores!”
Agree / Disagree?
I don’t care - I just got off night shift and I’m going to bed so I can dribble on my pillow and dream about being John McClane!
Gazz posted on August 3rd, 2007
Heya, Gazz!
Hell no! I love that movie, and I feel the end car chase provided a nice climax. It may have been due to the fact I saw the film for the first time in high school, but it seemed a nice fit to me.
But don’t feel bad about Death Proof. You’re not missing anything. Planet Terror, however, is worth seeing.
Chris Nelson posted on August 3rd, 2007
Hey,
Another reivew of this movie on DVD over at
OneSmallWindow
that seems to agree with you…
AG posted on September 8th, 2007
Just to let you know , the white “Vanishing Point” car is NOT a Mustang.
It is a 1970 Dodge Challenger.
The Mustang(1971) was the yellow and black car of Kim’s… and just to clear things up from other websites I’ve read reviews from ; Kim’s Mustang is not a Mach1, it is a basic coupe/notch-back with Mach1 stripes. (Mach1’s have a Fast-back and scooped hoods).
Mitch Davis posted on September 30th, 2007
Hey Mitch,
Yah, I noticed that a short bit after posting the original review. I think my wife actually corrected me on it (She’s the one who knows about cars in this family.), but I was just too lazy to go back an fix it.
It’s fixed now though! Thanks!
BTW, what did you think of the movie?
Chris Nelson posted on September 30th, 2007
Well I for one loved Grindhouse from start to finish and while I liked them both I actually prefer Deathproof out of the two. First of all everyone knows if its a Quentin film that your going to have lots of dialogue, its just a givin and if people have a problem with long bouts of dialogue then they just should not go and see QT movies.
I will admit the the dialogue in this film is not on par with his older films however that being said I didn’t find any of it boring or hard to sit through. It just didn’t have any lines that are gonna become the next Royale with Cheese in the world of dialogue. so while it was a bit below his other films it was still 100% QT and was still 100% entertaining.
I think the entire premise of the film is outstanding and when you actually stop and think about it is 100% in the realm of reality. There is nothing stopping some stunt guy from going out tomorrow and doing just what was in this film. Going to a bar and remaining 100% sober while watching your prey get shitfaced. As long as they happened to drive down a road that doesn’t have streetlights, again this whole premise is 100% believable and I think that is one of the reasons why I found it so disturbing.
I also really like how the film is basically split in two with the first half introducing you to the girls who will fall victim to him and the 2nd half introducing you to the girls that will ultimately be his undoing. I think both groups of women were cast perfectly and I think all of them put out great performances with maybe one exception and that is Jungle Julie. She got on my nerves a little bit but that is probably because she was portraying a woman who is hot and knows she is hot and I hate those kind of women. So really the fact that she annoyed me playing that kind of role is really a testament to how well she really played that role but she still annoyed me a bit, lol.
Then you have Kurt Russell and this is the Kurt Russell that everyone grew up loving. This is Escape from New York Kurt Russell and we haven’t seen him in a role like this in quite some time and lets face it Kurt is a bad mother when cast properly. I think he really really enjoyed playing this part and I think it really comes through in his performance. To me he sums it all up in the one scene where he is about to get in the car to drive the blond girl home and he glances right at the camera and gives the audience a very kid in a toy shop kind of smile.
Then you have the actual chase scenes and any fan of car chase scenes has to admit that they were some fantastic scenes and some awsome stunt work. I personally love car chase scenes and while I still think To Live and Die in L.A. remains #1 in terms of having the best car chase scene, this film is no slouch and puts itself right up there with some of the best that have been filmed.
I even loved the tiny little details like the missing reel of the lap dance where every guy in the world was saying, aw shit. Its funny, I have actually seen the DVD that has that scene put back in and I actually prefer it without. Sure it was nice seeing the actual lap dance but I still prefer it with the missing reel as it just made it more realistic to Grindhouse films and I loved the reaction that it gets. They should have just included it in the extras and kept the cut the same as the theatrical.
So to sum it up I loved the performances, I loved the actual premise of the film, I loved the action scenes and I even enjoyed most of the dialogue. Is it Quentin’s best? Absolutely not and I dont think he was even trying for that as this is not the genre you make a film in if your going for an oscar. I think this was a project that both Quentin and Rodriguez made simply because they wanted to do something different and they were both big fans of this kind of cinema. So I really dont think either Director was going for a personal best and I am betting they knew before hand that this is the kind of release that really polarizes an audience with some people really liking it and other absolutely hating it and I think we are seeing that kind of polarization even in the reviews that its getting.
Last but not least I think its a crying shame that people didn’t go out and see this and as a result the film did terrible and put Wienstien in a very bad position overall. Hollywood is a joke these days and I find myself watching more and more foreign films because of that fact. Its just one sequel after another and its all about money. The art of filmmaking has really been lost in the Hollywood machine and this release was a legitimate breath of fresh air. It was daring and creative and unlike anything we have seen in a long long long time. Ultimately it did horrible and all this is going to do is make it that much harder for people to make legitimately creative and daring films. In the end people only ended up screwing themselves by not getting behind this film and I hope people continue to enjoy the sequel machine cause its only getting worse and after what happened with Grindhouse I dont see that changing anytime soon. Its a damn shame wether you liked the film or not.
Mike posted on October 4th, 2007
I agree with Mike. How can you guys say this was a bad film when most of the Hollywood films today are just money-making junk? Too bad we dont see films like Deathproof often.
Alex posted on October 7th, 2007
Well, I’ve recently seen the director’s cut, and still maintain I don’t think it was a good film. I see your points, Mike, though even watching it the second time I had to hit the fast forward button quite a bit.
Alex, I’m not entirely sure how original it was. There was actually another movie about a cardriving serial-killer called Highwaymen from a few years back. Tarantino’s films tend to be a collage of other better films.
The thing about Death Proof is that it gained widespread attention because it was a mainstream “Grindhouse” film. Though, if you troll your direct to video section at your local video store, you’ll find a lot of other films with just as outlandish premises, and more authentic “Grindhouse-y” feel. While these don’t exactly count in the Grindhouse sense, I would recommend you check out Jake West’s Evil Aliens (came out last week) or James Gunn’s Slither for some overlooked goodness.
Chris Nelson posted on October 8th, 2007
I agree with many of the points you make about the film. I disagree, however, with your perspective on the female characters. Their interaction is really, very typical for how women of different interact when men are not around. I think that generally men would like to think differently, but I respect Quentin’s ability to observe women at their most comfortable, “real” levels, without men around to worry or flirt about, and with established friendships that aren’t really questioned. People give “Sex and the City” a lot of credit for capturing the female condition, but I think Quentin did a better job, all told. While there are certainly silly sexual references made in his typical style, I think he goes above and beyond in his portrayal of young, successful, “driven” women.
cheers!
jm
Jennifer Maciel posted on November 22nd, 2007
Hey Chris and ‘Kitten’:
Can you add me to your links and maybe partake in the enjoyment that is my new “side project”. You’ll be coming to it a bit “late” (there’s already 36 ‘journal entries’) but I wanted to make sure I was going to be committed to it before I blabbed about it.
You can find what I’m talking about here:
http://www.underdogdiaries.blogspot.com
And you can discuss anything regarding it by e-mailing me here:
[Email address removed by Chris. ]
Cheers buddies!
GAZZ
Gazz posted on November 24th, 2007
“”tumor of a nose”….a classic
~noclowns~
danny liberto posted on December 30th, 2007
Hey Danny. Thanks. I was pondering putting something about her looking like the bastard love child of Luis Guzman and post post op Michael Jackson, but it didn’t quite have the same ring to it. Thanks for checking out our site!
Chris Nelson posted on January 7th, 2008
hot cotton string
squeezeb posted on February 20th, 2008