Toolbox Murders (1978) dvd movie review

dreamlogic.net's MOVIE REVIEW . Toolbox Murders (1978)I actually never bothered to watch The Toolbox Murders on account it looked retarded, but after hearing that Tobe Hooper had remade the film, along with noticing the occasional site search popping up, and the fact I’m overdue for a review, I decided to pick it up.

Well, I guess sometimes first impressions are more accurate than you think.

The Toolbox Murders is the (supposedly true) story of a ski-masked murderer who takes it upon himself to cleanse the world of immoral women following the death of his daughter. He prowls an apartment complex, picking off loose women with the assorted carpentry tools, hence the film’s title. While it sounds promising, the main murders of the film happen within the first half hour. After that the film finally decides on a main character and the rest of the film is wasted on a boring protagonist trying to find his kidnapped sister, and an even more uninteresting killer who believes the girl he’s kidnapped to be his long dead daughter. Many of the scenes drag on, with characters seemingly incapable of rational thought, and dialogue befitting something more along the line of a late night skin-emax detective story. While most horror films of the 70’s seem to have a cult following of sorts, (Stephen King is actually quoted on the cover saying the film “Generates some genuinely scary moments.”), I don’t really find this film deserving. In my case, I hadn’t been this bored with a horror film since Let’s Scare Jessica to Death.

Now I’m not a big advocate of combining Freudian symbolism with a feminist perspective when analyzing a horror film, as I would liken it to using a chainsaw to dissect a frog (much dreamlogic.net's MOVIE REVIEW . Toolbox Murders (1978)too heavy duty a tool for the job) but in the case of the Toolbox Murders, I’m afraid that kind of “dissection” would probably be applicable. It could be just a coincidence, as there are so many terms for hard fucking that are applicable to the usage of a handyman’s tools, but I do think there is evidence to support this argument. You see a chick get “nailed”, one get “hammered”, another “screw(driver)ed”, and one get “drilled” all within the first half hour. Mind you, most of these deaths are fairly tame as far as splatter standards go, and cheesy enough to elicit more laughter than shrieks, but for the most part we do view the instruments of death through a fairly phallic perspective. When preparing to drill his first victim we sight down the long, spinning drill-bit as the killer aims at his victim, and when preparing to nail his final victim, he aligns the nail-gun primarily with his crotch. Only when he actually aims to kill do the shots come from above waist level. In that sense, I think the director was clearly going for a thinly veiled symbolic rape of the offending, evil, hippie/lesbian/loose women the killer targets. It also doesn’t help that all the women are shown “performing” stereotypical male fantasies. While surveying the apartment complex the killer sees a woman dancing in her 1st floor apartment window in her lingerie, only to later enter her apartment while she is masturbating in the bathtub. One of his other victims puts on a shower cap, gets in the shower with her clothes on, then gets out and removes her cloths, puts on a shirt (no pants), and goes outside to check the hallway for “stuff.” It makes no logical sense at all, but only serves to titillate us male viewers. Like I said, in this case, I would have to agree with the fem-Freudian viewpoint.

As far as the rest of the film goes there’s nothing really to make it stand out from a host of other exploitation/splatter films of the time, or to prevent even the most “virginal” horror Click Here to Buy Movie Posters!viewer from falling asleep. I will venture that I dug the score, but that’s definitely not enough to save this film from being a total mess.

The film’s mediocrity could also be reflected in the content of the extras. No making of feature. No Cast reunion doc. Just an interview with stag film star Kelly Nichols (proof positive that one’s nose does continue to grow, throught their life) on how great it was to get naked, masturbate, and killed on screen. She’s pretty proud of the fact that her death was one of Stephen King’s favourites, and oddly pleased by the fact that the film played in the theater that she worked in when she was a teenager. She even says she took her brothers with her to see her “performance.” The interview is aptly titled, I Got Nailed In THE TOOLBOX MURDERS - An interview with star Marianne Walters. Aside from that you have an audio commentary with star Pamela Ferdin, D.P. Gary Graver, and producer Tony DiDio (I didn’t bother to listen), a theatrical trailer, a TV “spot”, a collection of radio spots, a bio for star Cameron Mitchell, and a poster and still gallery. The disc does gain some points for having the most obnoxious chapter titles I’ve seen this year (ie: “4. Screwed to Death”, “11. Dead Girl’s Dildo”, “19. Incest and Murder”, and “21. Virgin Rape.”) though the titles are not indicative of anything quite as shocking within the film.

All in all, if you haven’t seen it, you’re not missing much. There may be some horror fans out there that wish to check out the film for a drunken party with their closest buds, but aside from that, skip it.

About the Author:

dreamlogic.net -- CHRIS NELSON

Chris Nelson has been an avid film fan since the age of six. His all-time splatter favorites (”samurai” and otherwise) include Lady Snowblood, Evil Dead 2, Re-Animator and Razorback.

Related Articles

 

Post a comment